In partnership with

Welcome, Automaters!

Like I said yesterday, it’s been quite the week!

Two major newspapers just got totally playedβ€”they published a summer reading list packed with fake books straight out of AI’s imagination, and nobody noticed until readers started calling it out.

Let’s break down this wild mix-up and find out how a bot managed to slip right into serious journalism.

Here's what we have for you today

πŸ—žοΈ Major Newspapers Completely Duped by AI

Two major newspapers just got totally exposed for recommending a bunch of fake books for summer reading.

Yep, like, completely made-up titles written by AI.

This all started when The Chicago Sun-Times and The Philadelphia Inquirer ran a β€œSummer Reading List for 2025” in their print editions (last week). At first glance, it looked solidβ€”big-name authors, thoughtful blurbs, the kind of list you’d rip out and take to the bookstore.

Except... Reddit sleuths quickly noticed something weird. Only five out of the fifteen books actually exist. The rest? Hallucinated by a chatbot.

One of the most awkward moments? The list claimed Brit Bennettβ€”author of The Vanishing Halfβ€”had a new book out called Hurricane Season that β€œexplores family bonds tested by natural disasters.”

Sounds deep. Very Oprah’s Book Club. But also, very fake. The truth is, she never wrote that. The book doesn’t exist. Like, at all.

So how did this AI fever dream make it into two respected newspapers?

Well, meet Marco Buscaglia, the guy behind the list. He created it for a syndicated insert that both papers published. Turns out, he used AI to generate the content, admitted he didn’t double-check anything, and then just… sent it off.

The Sun-Times immediately tried to backpedal, saying the insert wasn’t their editorial content and hadn’t been approved by their newsroom. They posted on Bluesky, making it clear they take the mistake seriously and are β€œlooking into it.”

Meanwhile, the Inquirer was doing its own clean-up, pulling the content from its digital edition and admitting the AI-generated fluff violated their internal policies. According to their CEO, the newsroom had nothing to do with any of it.

But here's the thing: there was no clear sign that the content wasn’t written by actual journalists.

To the average reader flipping through the paper, it looked official. Like something the paper’s culture editor would have approved over a cappuccino. But nopeβ€”it was all a bot doing its best β€œpretend to be a book critic” impression.

And honestly, this kind of mess couldn’t come at a worse time.

The Sun-Times (which was bought by Chicago Public Media in 2022) has already had a rough yearβ€”laying off 20% of its staff back in March. And WBEZ, the NPR station under the same umbrella, has cut multiple podcasts and gone through several rounds of layoffs.

The Inquirer? Same boat. They also did layoffs this year, and trust in local journalism is hanging by a thread as it is.

The bigger picture here?

AI hallucinations are still a very real problem.

Even the latest models sometimes spit out total fiction, but with the confident swagger of a tenured journalist. And when no human editor steps in to check the facts, this is what happens: Fake books. Fake blurbs. Real outrage.

So yeah. An AI wrote a summer reading list. The newspapers printed it. Most of the books were totally made up. Everyone’s embarrassed. Readers are confused. And somewhere, Brit Bennett is probably wondering why strangers keep congratulating her on a novel she’s never heard of.

If you ask me, we’ve officially reached the point where AI needs a babysitter. Because left alone, it’ll just start writing fanfic and calling it journalism.

Find out why 1M+ professionals read Superhuman AI daily.

In 2 years you will be working for AI

Or an AI will be working for you

Here's how you can future-proof yourself:

  1. Join the Superhuman AI newsletter – read by 1M+ people at top companies

  2. Master AI tools, tutorials, and news in just 3 minutes a day

  3. Become 10X more productive using AI

Join 1,000,000+ pros at companies like Google, Meta, and Amazon that are using AI to get ahead.

πŸ₯Š Huawei’s AI Chips Spark New U.S.-China Clash

So, remember when the U.S. dropped those new guidelines warning companies not to touch advanced Chinese chipsβ€”especially Huawei’s Ascend AI chips?

Yeah, well… China saw that and said, β€œAbsolutely not.”

Now they’re calling it out as discriminatory and straight-up sabotageβ€”accusing the U.S. of wrecking the diplomatic progress both sides made literally days ago.

Here’s what went down:

The U.S. Commerce Department issued a fresh warning, saying that using Chinese AI chips could violate export controlsβ€”basically telling American firms not to even think about it.

And of course, Chinaβ€”very much not amusedβ€”fired back, demanding the U.S. β€œcorrect its wrongdoings” and reverse the chip guidance… or brace for impact.

In short, China’s Commerce Ministry made it crystal clear: if the U.S. keeps pushing, they’re ready to clap back with β€œresolute measures.”

They’re accusing the U.S. move of being:

  • An abuse of export control laws

  • Based on β€œunfounded accusations”

  • A typical act of unilateral bullying and protectionism.

  • And here’s the mic-drop line from Beijing: β€œTrying to trip others won’t make yourself run faster.”

Translation? Sabotaging us won’t make your tech win any medals.

What makes all this even more awkward? The U.S. and China just agreed to a surprisingly friendly 90-day tariff truce after high-level talks in Genevaβ€”where both sides promised to ease up on the whole triple-digit tariff drama.

Even more ironic? China’s Vice Commerce Minister and the U.S. Trade Rep literally met again last week in South Korea during an APEC meetingβ€”but no one’s saying anything about what went down. So yeah, we’re all just out here guessing.

Bottom line? Washington’s trying to protect its AI edge.Beijing’s not cool with being cast as the villain. And even though both sides smiled for the cameras recently, behind the scenes… it’s giving β€œwe’re not over this.”

🧱Around The AI Block

πŸ€– ChatGPT Prompt Of The Day: Turn FAQs into Persuasive Sales Copy

Your FAQs aren’t just a list of answered questionsβ€”they’re a goldmine for sales.

They reveal real objections or hesitations, so by answering them clearly and confidently, you can address concerns before they arise, build trust, and guide potential customers toward a purchase.

This approach saves you time and strengthens your messaging by turning genuine concerns into powerful sales points.

Here’s how to use this strategy effectively:

  1. Choose Real, Frequent Questions: Pick questions you actually receive often to make the copy relevant and authentic.

  2. Focus on Objections: Identify concerns or doubts behind the questions and address them head-on in your sales copy.

  3. Use Clear, Reassuring Language: Your tone should ease worries and build confidence in your product or service.

  4. Include Calls to Action: After answering, encourage readers to take the next stepβ€”which could be to buy, contact, or learn more.

  5. Keep It Conversational: Write like you’re talking to a friend to make the copy engaging and relatable.

Here’s an example:

Turn these 3 common questions I get into persuasive sales copy that removes objections and builds trust. For each question:

Identify the underlying concern or objection behind the question.

Address that objection clearly and confidently using reassuring, easy-to-understand language.

Use a conversational tone that sounds friendly and relatable, as if speaking directly to a potential customer.

Include a strong call to action at the end of each response that encourages the reader to take the next step (such as buying the product, contacting us, or learning more).

Make sure the sales copy feels authentic by basing it on real, frequently asked questions to ensure relevance and trustworthiness.

Here are the questions: [insert questions here]

Here’s a sneak peak:

Upgrade now to see the complete prompt video. And vote this for your Workout of the Week!

Is this your AI Workout of the Week (WoW)? Cast your vote!

Login or Subscribe to participate

That's all we've got for you today.

Did you like today's content? We'd love to hear from you! Please share your thoughts on our content belowπŸ‘‡

What'd you think of today's email?

Login or Subscribe to participate

Your feedback means a lot to us and helps improve the quality of our newsletter.

logo

πŸš€ Want your daily AI workout?

Premium members get daily video prompts, premium newsletter, an no-ad experience - and more!

πŸ”“ Unlock Full Access

Premium members get::

  • πŸ‘¨πŸ»β€πŸ« A 30% discount on the AI Education Library (a $600 value - and counting!)
  • πŸ“½οΈ Get the daily AI WoD (a $29.99 value!)
  • βœ… Priority help with AI Troubleshooter
  • βœ… Thursday premium newsletter
  • βœ… No ad experience
  • βœ… and more....

Reply

or to participate

More From Capital

No posts found