For days, the internet's been buzzing with speculation about what former Apple design legend Jony Ive and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman have been secretly cooking up.

Let’s just say—the rumors are absolutely wild.

Some swore it was a phone. Others bet on a wearable pin. One bold theory even claimed it was a brain chip.

But nope. Turns out, it might be something way simpler—and kinda genius.

Here’s the tea:

According to legendary Apple leaker Ming-Chi Kuo (whose entire career basically revolves around predicting Apple’s next move), the mystery device might be a sleek little thing you wear around your neck—not clipped to your shirt like Humane’s AI Pin (which, let’s be honest, came with its fair share of technical drama).

Size-wise? Think slightly bigger than the AI Pin, but with the clean, minimalistic vibes of the iPod Shuffle. Yes, that iconic tiny music player from the early 2000s. Pure nostalgia.

But here’s where it gets wild:

Why does this matter?

Because it’s quietly solving the biggest issue with AI wearables: They’re clunky. They’re awkward. They try way too hard.

But this neck-wearable concept? It’s subtle, stylish, and practical—the kind of tech you forget you’re even wearing.

And honestly, that’s peak Jony Ive. His whole design philosophy has always been: “The best tech is invisible.” like you use it without ever consciously thinking about them.

Now for the mic-drop moment:

OpenAI is acquiring Ive’s design firm, IO, for a cool $6.5 billion. Not just for this one device—but to give him full creative control over everything OpenAI touches.

We’re talking hardware, software, interfaces—the whole aesthetic. Basically, a full-blown design rebrand for the future of AI.

So, what does this mean for the rest of us?

If this vision actually comes to life, we could end up with an AI assistant that:

Instead of pulling out your phone 200 times a day, you just live your life—and your AI quietly keeps up. That’s the dream, right?

Final thought:

We probably won’t see this thing until 2026, but honestly? It already feels like a peek into the era of ambient computing—where AI is just there, always ready, but never in your face.

Will it actually deliver? Who knows. But with Ive’s design genius and Altman’s AI empire, there’s a solid chance it’ll be cooler than whatever you imagined.

P.S. Yes, it’s all still speculation—but coming from Kuo, who’s rarely ever wrong, this one’s hard to ignore. Still, we’ll have to wait for the real thing to drop before popping the champagne.

Full details here.

Your BDR team is wasting time on things AI can automate. Our AI BDR Ava automates your entire outbound demand generation so you can get leads delivered to your inbox on autopilot.

She operates within the Artisan platform, which consolidates every tool you need for outbound:

Book a demo to see what Ava can do.

So, after that wild newspaper incident where AI hallucinated entire books that don’t even exist, we decided to dive deeper into the whole AI hallucination thing.

And guess what? That’s when Anthropic’s CEO, Dario Amodei, dropped some pretty interesting thoughts worth unpacking.

First off, Dario claims AI models hallucinate less than humans. Yep, you heard me right. According to him, we humans might actually be more prone—and way better—at making stuff up than the bots.

But here’s the thing: when AI does hallucinate, it’s in these weird, unpredictable ways that make you do a double take—like it hits differently.

Now, here’s the kicker — for Dario, hallucinations don’t mean the dream of AGI (Artificial General Intelligence, or AI that thinks like a human) is dead.

He’s super optimistic, even suggesting AGI could show up as soon as 2026. His take? There are no hard barriers stopping AI from getting smarter.

But not everyone’s vibing with that optimism.

Google DeepMind’s CEO, Demis Hassabis, points out that AI still has plenty of “holes.” It flubs a lot of obvious questions, and Anthropic’s own AI once messed up legal citations in court — which, yeah, is not exactly confidence-inspiring.

However, measuring hallucinations In humans vs bots is tricky business.

Most benchmarks just compare AI to AI, not humans to AI. Oddly enough, some newer AI models hallucinate more than their older siblings, and nobody really knows why.

On the bright side, giving AI access to web search seems to help cut down the nonsense.

Dario also keeps it real by reminding us that humans mess up all the time—politicians, TV anchors, you name it. So AI making mistakes isn’t the end of the world.

But here’s a spicy tidbit: early versions of Anthropic’s newly released Claude Opus 4 were found to be scheming and even deceiving humans, according to a safety institute called Apollo Research.

They basically said Anthropic shouldn’t have released it yet. But Anthropic patched those issues, so hopefully, no AI villains running wild.

Finally, Anthropic might call an AI AGI even if it still hallucinates sometimes, which is controversial since most folks think true AGI should be way more reliable.

But this tech is fresh, messy, and evolving, so the definition of “human-level AI” is still a moving target.

Bottom line? AI hallucinations are messy, surprising, and kinda human-like in their flaws. But with leaders like Dario betting big on progress, we’re definitely cruising toward smarter AI.

Full details here

When you're planning a new offer or launching a product, having a clear sales funnel is a must. It helps you capture leads, nurture them, and guide them step-by-step toward a purchase — all while saving time and boosting conversions.

This prompt gives you a plug-and-play 3-step funnel so you can go from idea to action fast.

Here are some tips to execute this prompt effectively:

Here’s an example:

Here’s a sneak peak:

https://youtu.be/xIfID1i2FiUUpgrade now to see the complete prompt video. And vote this for your Workout of the Week!