Big tech promised us an AI-powered future — one that’s faster, smarter, cleaner.

And sure, it’s delivered in some areas (hello smart recommendations and AI copilots). But in others? It's been total chaos… with a generous side of public embarrassment.

And now, that wild AI dream has bounced into a whole new arena: tennis.

Yep — Wimbledon, the oldest, most prestigious tennis tournament on the planet, decided this was the year to fully bench human line judges and let AI make the calls.

We’re all for innovation, don’t get us wrong. But letting AI officiate live sports?

That’s a bold move.

And guess what? The tech fumbled. Multiple times.

So, what went wrong?

Pretty much everything.

For starters, the players weren’t loving it, the system that was supposed to bring accuracy and consistency, only brought complaints. Lots of them.

Emma Raducanu called out the AI for missing a painfully obvious out-ball from her opponent — one that was clearly confirmed by a TV replay.

Jack Draper, Britain’s No. 1, wasn’t impressed either. His take? The system just isn’t “100% accurate.”

And it doesn’t stop there:

After all that drama, you’d expect some kind of apology or fix, right?

Well… Nope.

Debbie Jevans, chair of the All England Club, came out swinging. She basically said players used to beg for this tech.

But then, this isn’t just a Wimbledon problem.

Back in April, Alexander Zverev dragged the same tech on Instagram, posting a photo of a very out ball the tech somehow called in.

So yeah…the receipts are stacking.

And while Wimbledon says the glitch has now been patched, let’s be real — the trust damage is already done.

Bottom line:

This whole mess shows what happens when AI goes from supporting humans to replacing them completely.

And honestly? It’s making a strong case for why some roles — especially ones that need instincts, experience, and real-time judgment — probably still need actual humans in the mix.

Because if we’re out here arguing with a robot about whether a ball was out or not…Maybe the future doesn’t need another Terminator.

Maybe it just needs a little more teamwork.

Catch the full report here.

This free 5-day email course takes you all the way from basic AI prompts to building your own personal software. Whether you're already using ChatGPT or just starting with AI, this course is your gateway to learn advanced AI skills for peak performance.

Each day delivers practical, immediately applicable techniques straight to your inbox:

No technical skills required, no fluff. Just pure knowledge you can use right away. For free.

Get the course

You might’ve noticed it… or maybe it flew right past you. But a new experimental feature called “Study Together” just popped up in some ChatGPT users’ toolkits.

And no, it’s not ChatGPT suddenly deciding to do a group project. Well… actually, maybe it kind of is.

From what’s rumored so far, “Study Together” might not be about giving you answers — it might be about making you do the thinking.

Instead of serving up neat little replies to your prompts, this new mode could flip the script. According to speculation, it might throw questions back at you, challenge you, and nudge you to explain your thoughts — kinda like a Socratic method moment, but make it AI.

Some users are already whispering about where this might be going.

Like… could we be getting a mode where multiple people can join in for a group study sesh with ChatGPT as the moderator? A virtual study group, powered by AI — and maybe with fewer distractions than real life.

Right now? It’s all a bit unclear.

OpenAI is playing it very close to the chest — no announcements, no release dates, not even a “coming soon” teaser. All ChatGPT itself has said is that the feature’s still in testing, and it might end up being exclusive to ChatGPT Plus.

But hey, the timing’s kinda sus right?

Zoom out for a sec and it looks like this might be OpenAI’s way of cleaning up its image in the education space. Because let’s face it — ChatGPT is both a teacher’s dream (shoutout to all those AI-powered lesson plans) and a student’s favorite shortcut.

Some folks even argue it’s lowkey wrecking higher education.

So yeah… “Study Together” feels like OpenAI’s way of gently nudging us back toward the “let’s actually learn something” lane.

And if this thing does go public, it could totally shift the vibe — turning ChatGPT from a passive answer machine into something way more interactive.

We’re talking more thinking. More discussion. Less autopilot. More learning, less lurking.

And honestly? That’s kind of a win — especially for students who need a little push but don’t want to be lectured by… well… a lecture.

Until then, we wait.

Or, you know, keep hitting refresh to see if “Study Together” magically shows up in your sidebar.

Catch the details here.

Want your content to sound just like your favorite author, expert, or influencer? This prompt helps your AI writing assistant fully adopt the voice, tone, rhythm, and emotional depth of any person you choose.

Whether you’re drafting tweets like Elon, emails like Tim Ferriss, or stories in the style of Jane Austen—it nails the vibe every time. Perfect for ghostwriting, brand voice development, parody, fan fiction, or replicating your own past style across formats.

To get the best results:

Here’s the prompt:

Here’s a sneak peek:

https://youtu.be/eL-di0UdJ1Y

Upgrade now to see this whole month’s prompt videos and more, or buy TODAY’S WOD for just $1.99