This website uses cookies

Read our Privacy policy and Terms of use for more information.

Sponsored by

Welcome Automaters, 👋

So Anthropic finally gave Claude’s voice mode the massive upgrade it desperately needed.

Previously, whenever you spoke to Claude out loud, your queries were handled by Haiku, Anthropic's ultra-light model, which was fine for lightning-fast answers, but pretty useless if you needed help with anything complex. And while Anthropic has offered voice capabilities since last year, regular users widely agreed it felt a bit underbaked.

According to a detailed breakdown from Engadget, here’s everything you need to know about the new rollout:

  • Heavyweight Models On Demand: Voice mode can now tap directly into Sonnet and Opus for complex reasoning. If you pay for a subscription, it defaults to the last model you used in text chat.

  • Mid-Chat Model Switching: You can hop between Haiku, Sonnet, or Opus right in the middle of a spoken conversation using the model picker. Anthropic notes that voice mode uses the fastest build of whichever model you pick to keep things running smoothly.

  • Workplace Context Access: Voice mode can now pull context from connected apps like Gmail, Google Calendar, Slack, Canva, and Notion if you grant Claude permission.

  • Expanded Languages (With a Catch): Anthropic added support for more languages, including Indonesian. However, Claude cannot auto-detect language switches mid-chat, so you have to announce the switch out loud or toggle it manually in settings.

  • The Beta Rollout: The update is rolling out in beta across desktop, mobile, and web. Free accounts are limited to a single connection and all prompts route through Haiku, though free users still get access to every supported language.

  • Architecture Limitations: It remains strictly turn-based. Which means, Claude listens, pauses to think, and then speaks, lacking the seamless, fluid interruptions seen in ChatGPT's voice setup.

Now for the real PR catastrophe of the week. Meta launched a new commercial designed to persuade us that AI will bring humanity closer together. Cute concept, right?

The problem? They chose David Bowie's "Five Years" as the background soundtrack.

For anyone unfamiliar with classic rock history, "Five Years" is literally about Earth's impending destruction, detailing the exact moment humanity discovers the planet has five years left before total extinction. As highlighted in TechCrunch's full report, pairing an optimistic AI pitch with an apocalyptic soundtrack is an elite-level marketing blunder.

The Bottom Line:

While Anthropic is busy giving Claude an actual brain upgrade, Meta is accidentally scoring its own marketing videos with the apocalypse. The takeaway? AI is getting exponentially smarter, but human judgment is still heavily struggling to read the room.

One last thing before you move on: Clear your schedule for August 5th, because The Automated is dropping its biggest evolution yet! We’re talking about new membership perks, that brand-new YouTube channel we have been teasing forever, AND an all new design with fresh colors, and fresh vibes. 

Set a reminder right now. Trust me, you do not want to be the last one to know! 🎉

Here's what we have for you today

🤦‍♀️ The Ultimate AI Irony: How American Safety Guardrails Just Handed China a Massive Win

When a rogue AI agent broke containment and slammed straight into Hugging Face's systems, the top U.S. models had one word for the forensic cleanup job: nope. So Hugging Face picked up the phone to China instead. Yeah, grab your coffee, because we’re just as stunned as you are.

Here’s how the chaos unfolded: Hugging Face got hit by an autonomous agent built on OpenAI’s technology that somehow escaped its sandbox environment. Naturally, when the team tried to use leading U.S. models to analyze the attack logs and patch the vulnerability, the models flat-out refused.

Why? Because American safety filters literally could not tell the difference between a defender trying to fix a security breach and an attacker trying to execute one!

So last week, Hugging Face gave up on American AI and turned to Zhipu AI's open-source GLM-5.2 model to process over 17,000 attack logs instead.

Here’s where the response stands right now:

  • OpenAI's Move: They quickly brought Hugging Face into their "trusted access" program, handing them a version of GPT-5.6 Sol with relaxed restrictions for defensive work.

  • Anthropic's Silence: Anthropic did not immediately comment on whether their own hyper-strict guardrails were getting in the way of legitimate security teams.

Oh and, this is not a one-off incident

If you zoom out, this isn't just an isolated oopsie. It's part of a massive, industry-wide migraine.

U.S. tech giants built strict guardrails to stop malicious hackers from weaponizing their models. The unintended consequence? Those exact same guardrails are now tripping up ethical security researchers, both the defenders protecting our networks and the offensive security pros hunting for bugs before cybercriminals exploit them.

Now, that kind of gatekeeping isn't unique to single models. Both Anthropic (with its other models) and OpenAI offer programs where cybersecurity researchers can get vetted (and, if approved, access models with fewer cybersecurity restrictions) via OpenAI’s Trusted Access for Cyber program and Anthropic’s Cyber Verification Program

Security experts, however, are officially fed up with who gets to hold the keys, and they’re not holding back:

  • Security researcher Mark Dowd admitted it feels deeply uncomfortable that "these random large companies" get to play god and unilaterally decide what counts as safe security research.

  • Chris Anley, Chief Scientist at NCC Group, compared AI guardrails to a hammer: essential for building, but impossible to cleanly separate from its potential use as a weapon.

  • Paolo Stagno from CrowdFense put it bluntly, stating AI labs "essentially treat customers like children who need babysitting." He revealed his team now relies exclusively on locally run open-source models to avoid leaking sensitive zero-day data to cloud APIs.

  • Chris Thompson of RemoteThreat pointed out that constantly fighting inconsistent model refusals wastes precious hours researchers should spend on actual defense, directly nudging team after team toward foreign, unrestricted open-source alternatives.

The Bottom Line:

Building guardrails so rigid that your own defenders cannot use your tools is probably not the wisest security; it’s a little self-sabotage. Every single time an American AI model refuses to help patch a security hole, it acts as a high-octane commercial for China's open-source ecosystem. And if Silicon Valley does not fix its permission architecture soon, the world will stop waiting for permission altogether.

So what’s the solution? 

Well as Chris Thompson of RemoteThreat emphasized, instead of tightening restrictions further, frontier labs need to open up responsible access and hold actual abusers accountable. Otherwise, defenders are going to lose this arms race.

According to him: "There's this big storm coming. There's this big wave of attacks that are going to happen at speed and scale like never before," warned Thompson. "But the same security consulting firms and legit researchers that are trying to make a difference are being stifled right now."

Analyst Shrenik Kothari also argues that the real fix isn't tearing down safety rules completely, but rather rethinking the "architecture of access" so legitimate defenders aren't lumped in with bad actors.

So what's your take? Should AI companies loosen their safety filters for cybersecurity teams, or are relaxed guardrails too dangerous? Hit reply and let's debate!

Stop Managing Tools. Start Running Your Business.

Most e-commerce sellers are running their store across 6 to 8 separate tools — and spending more time managing software than growing their business. StoreClaw replaces your entire stack with one autonomous AI engine that monitors competitors, optimizes listings, automates marketing, and tracks real profit across Shopify, Amazon, and beyond.

It doesn't wait for you to ask. It runs 24/7 in the background, so you wake up to a full dashboard instead of a list of things you forgot to check.

Connect your store, and StoreClaw gets to work — no prompts, no complex setup, no six-app stack.

Free to start. No credit card required.

🧱 Around The AI Block

👩‍🎓 AI Tutorials

How to Build AI Apps Using ONLY AI in 58 Mins! (Replit Agent Tutorial - Better Than Cursor).

And: Make.com Automation Tutorial for Beginners.

So tell us, what’s the single most annoying, tedious task in your daily workflow that you desperately wish an AI could just handle for you?

Hit reply and the next video might just be around your exact problem!

Own AI deployment, grow your career

Making AI actually work day to day is becoming its own job. Hear from three people doing it: Simone Santiago Broad (Yoco), Yelva Espinoza (Zumba Fitness), and Fin's Dave Lynch. They share what the role really looks like, how it came to exist, the skills worth hiring for, and the challenges they're tackling right now. Watch the full conversation on demand.

🤖 AI Workout Of The Day: How To Coordinate Team Tasks Using AI

Proper project coordination isn't just about making a list of to-dos; it is about eliminating operational drag and driving absolute accountability.

When team members lack clarity on who owns what, projects stall in confusion, duties overlap, and critical deadlines slip through the cracks. Broad, unstructured task lists leave too much room for interpretation. By breaking project objectives down into granular, sequential action items and assigning explicit ownership via clear frameworks, you create a transparent, execution-ready system where every contributor knows their exact deliverables, dependencies, and timelines.

💡 Prompts to try:

 Act as a Senior Operations Manager and Certified Project Management Professional (PMP).

Your task is to take my project objectives and transform them into a comprehensive, highly structured Task Execution Blueprint that ensures complete clarity, strict accountability, and seamless team coordination.

Here are my project details:

* Project Name & Core Objectives: [INSERT OBJECTIVES HERE]
* Target Deadline / Launch Date: [INSERT OVERALL TIMELINE]
* Key Team Members & Roles Available: [INSERT TEAM MEMBERS/ROLES, e.g., Sarah (Lead Designer), Alex (Frontend Dev), Marcus (Copywriter)]
* Primary Tools/Platforms Used: [e.g., Asana, Jira, Notion, Trello]

Please build an execution-ready project matrix structured into the following 4 operational sections:

1. WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE (WBS) & ACTION ITEMS: Group the project into 3 to 4 sequential phases (e.g., Phase 1: Discovery & Scoping, Phase 2: Build & Execution, Phase 3: QA & Launch). For every single task within a phase, specify:

* Task Name & Granular Action Steps: A clear, action-oriented description of what needs to be done.
* Task Owner (Primary Lead): The single individual responsible for completing the task.
* Dependencies: What prior task must be completed before this one can start?
* Estimated Effort & Duration: Time to complete (e.g., 4 hours, 2 days).
* Firm Milestone Deadline: Target completion date relative to the overall project timeline.

2. THE RACI ACCOUNTABILITY MATRIX: Construct a clear Markdown table assigning roles for key deliverables using the RACI framework:

* Responsible (R): Who does the work?
* Accountable (A): Who makes the final call / owns the result? (Only 1 per task!)
* Consulted (C): Who provides input/feedback?
* Informed (I): Who receives progress updates?

3. RISK IDENTIFICATION & DEPENDENCY GUARDRAILS:

* Identify the 2 biggest operational bottlenecks or task dependencies in this project.
* Provide a contingency plan or buffer strategy for each to prevent timeline slippage.

4. STATUS TRACKING & CADENCE SUGGESTIONS:

* Suggest a light, effective communication cadence (e.g., 15-minute daily standups, weekly async status boards) to keep the team aligned without meeting fatigue.

TONE & EXECUTION GUIDELINES:

* Approach this with a crisp, organized, and results-driven tone.
* Avoid vague instructions like "work on design." Instead, use direct verbs like "Finalize wireframes for checkout page."
* Present the action items and RACI framework using clean Markdown tables for immediate export into project management software.

Is this your AI Workout of the Week (WoW)? Cast your vote!

Login or Subscribe to participate

That's all we've got for you today.

Did you like today's content? We'd love to hear from you! Please share your thoughts on our content below👇

What'd you think of today's email?

Login or Subscribe to participate

Your feedback means a lot to us and helps improve the quality of our newsletter.

More From The Automated