I told y’all this was coming.

Just yesterday, I mentioned how Anthropic became the first to successfully argue “fair use” in court for training its AI on copyrighted books—and how that could tip the scales in Big Tech’s favor.

Well, guess what?

Boom. Meta just won its case too. Less than 24 hours later, another domino falls.

Here’s what went down:

Thirteen authors, including comedian and writer Sarah Silverman sued Meta for allegedly using their copyrighted books to train its AI models without permission.

But surprise twist: Judge Vince Chhabria sided with Meta, ruling that their use of the books qualifies as fair use — meaning it’s legally chill (at least in this particular case).

And the kicker? He didn’t even need a jury. This was a summary judgment, like the case was so lopsided in Meta’s favor that the judge shut it down early.

Here’s why Meta won:

Still, authors take a deep breath—this isn’t an open season on copyrighted content.

In fact, the judge made it very clear: this ruling only went Meta’s way because the authors made weak arguments. A better case, with stronger receipts? That could change the outcome entirely.

Still, with both Anthropic and Meta walking away clean, the tech world is feeling pretty bold right now.

So bold that Altman’s already out here swinging at The New York Times over their lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. (Seriously, go check that out — it’s kinda hilarious.)

And it's not just the Times. Disney and Universal are also going after Midjourney for allegedly training AI on films and TV shows.

So yeah, the lawsuits are still coming fast and furious.

But if you’re keeping score, that’s two big wins in a row for Big Tech.

And like I said yesterday: This is the start of a legal shift.

You can catch the full details here!

Keeping up with AI is hard – we get it!

That’s why over 1M professionals read Superhuman AI to stay ahead.

Sign up and start mastering AI

Is Meta encroaching into our space a little too much… or are we just being dramatic?

Because now, Meta AI can literally read and summarize your private WhatsApp chats.

So, if you missed 83 messages in the group chat while you were offline, Meta AI will catch you up with quick, clean bullet points.

Sounds helpful, right? Well, here’s what you need to know:

And get this: Meta promises it can’t read your messages, thanks to its so-called Private Processing tech — and don’t worry, other group members can’t see your summary either.

Now, before you start wondering — It’s off by default, and yes, it’s totally optional.

If you’re not feeling it, you can head into Advanced Privacy Settings to block AI features in your group chats.

That said… some folks are still giving it the side-eye.

Oh, and don’t forget: Meta’s also testing ads on WhatsApp, which feels like a full-on betrayal if you remember how its founders once swore they’d never go there.

So yeah… is this genuinely useful or just another step too far?

We’ll let you decide.

More info here.

Ever feel like ChatGPT is giving you a TED Talk when all you really want is a simple answer?

You're not alone. Sometimes, all we need is clarity—no fluff, no filler, just the facts.

This prompt cuts through the noise and keeps ChatGPT laser-focused. It helps you get clear, direct responses without the usual repetition. Whether you're short on time, deep in a project, or just prefer sharper replies, this will keep things crisp and to the point.

Here’s How to Use This Prompt Effectively:

Pro Tip: It can also be used alongside other prompts too.

Here’s the prompt:

Here’s a sneak peek:

https://youtu.be/GoeOAO_w_CA

Upgrade now to see this whole month’s prompt videos and more, or buy TODAY’S WOD for just $1.99