This website uses cookies

Read our Privacy policy and Terms of use for more information.

In partnership with

Welcome Automaters, 👋

So it turns out that a computer algorithm cannot teach itself what decades of hands-on, grease-under-the-fingernails human experience already knows.

Ford executives just peeled back the curtain on a massive strategic pivot. The automaker frantically brought back 350 veteran technical specialists to fix a lingering quality and recall crisis that their shiny AI systems simply could not solve.

Some of these seasoned experts were former Ford employees who had previously retired or moved on. Others were specialists poached back from various supplier companies. Either way, Ford leadership looked at their internal metrics and realized they needed the old guard back in the room.

So what exactly is going on?

Ford's Chief Operating Officer Kumar Galhotra candidly admitted that the company had been leaning entirely too hard on automated quality control software, and let's be real: the practical results were a total mess.

The core issue wasn't that the AI software was completely broken. The problem was that a wave of hyper-experienced human workers left the company over the last few product cycles before their brainpower could be properly captured by the data teams. Because of this institutional knowledge drain, the automated tools were essentially trained on an incomplete dataset, causing them to amplify weak manufacturing inputs rather than catching actual structural flaws.

Ford’s Vice President of Vehicle Hardware Engineering Charles Poon put the corporate blunder into hilariously blunt words: "Mistakenly, we thought that by just introducing artificial intelligence and ingesting the design requirements that we had, that that would produce a high-quality product. It did not."

To save the day, Ford crowned these returning experts with an iconic new internal nickname: the "gray beard" engineers.

  • The Mission: They’re hunting down mechanical failure points before a part ever touches the actual assembly line.

  • The Twist: Ford is not ditching tech forever. The gray beards are actually being used to mentor junior staff and help reprogram and train the underlying AI tools.

  • The Receipts: This strategic human-led pivot is already on track to shave a cool $1 billion in costs off Ford's balance sheet this year. Even better, Ford just secured the coveted number one spot among mass-market car brands in the latest J.D. Power U.S. Initial Quality Study.

The ultimate takeaway for the group chat is clear. AI is a spectacular utility tool, but if you don't have seasoned human minds steering the ship, you’re just automating your errors at a much faster pace.

Real quick: We go much deeper on YouTube

So go over there, hit Subscribe, tap that notification bell and come hang with us where the real conversations happen. You see, subscribing keeps you plugged in so you get the right links, the right videos, right when they drop.

Here's what we have for you today

🦾 Asian AI Startups Launch Mythos-Level Models as Anthropic's Export Ban Creates a Global Power Vacuum

While the U.S. government was busy locking down Anthropic’s most powerful AI models to keep it out of international hands, Asia quietly showed up with its own set of keys. Talk about a spectacular backfire!

Here’s the short version of the drama: roughly two weeks ago, the Trump administration slapped emergency national security export controls on Anthropic. They banned its flagship model, Mythos, and its restricted sibling, Fable 5, from leaving American soil. 

The official logic? These architectures are considered so wildly powerful that they’re essentially classified national security weapons. Fair enough.

But here’s the massive plot twist that absolutely nobody in Washington planned for: Asia did not sit around crying about it. They immediately built their own alternatives.

First up, Tokyo-based Sakana AI, a high-flying startup co-founded by legendary former Google researchers, just dropped a brand-new model called Fugu (and yes, it’s explicitly named after the potentially lethal Japanese blowfish, which is an incredibly bold branding choice).

  • The Strategy: Instead of spending hundreds of millions of dollars trying to train a massive, monolithic model from scratch, Sakana took an unusual approach. They built a lightweight, seven-billion-parameter orchestrator.

  • How it works: Think of Fugu as an elite conductor controlling a massive AI orchestra. It connects to various external APIs, automatically figures out which specialized model should handle each part of a complex problem, and coordinates them as a team.

  • The Flex: Sakana claims this collective intelligence system stands completely shoulder-to-shoulder with Fable 5 and Mythos on advanced engineering, scientific,and reasoning benchmarks.

A Sakana spokesperson told TechCrunch that the timing of this launch was "entirely coincidental" with the U.S. ban. Sure, Jan! But their actual website explicitly markets the product as "delivering frontier capability without the risk of export controls." Coincidental is doing a massive amount of heavy lifting in that sentence!

Meanwhile, over in Beijing, Chinese tech firms are being even more direct about filling the void.

  • Massive cybersecurity firm 360 Security unveiled a powerful vulnerability-discovery tool called Tulongfeng. They claim it goes head-to-head with Mythos specifically on hunting down software vulnerabilities. They also unveiled Yitianzhen, built to automate cyber defence and incident response, with their founder calling AI bug-hunting a "national strategic asset."

  • Separately, AI powerhouse Zhipu AI dropped its brand-new GLM-5.2 model (affectionately known as Z.ai). According to independent security researchers cited by The Wall Street Journal, this model actually matches or outperforms Anthropic’s powerful model, Mythos, in some cybersecurity and vulnerability detection scenarios.

And here’s the most dangerous piece of gossip: GLM-5.2 is completely open-weight. That means absolutely anyone can download the raw file and run it locally on their own hardware. There are no corporate gates, no expensive API keys, and zero government permission slips required.

The Bottom Line:

When you look at the big picture, Anthropic was riding an absolute financial high, crossing a historic $47 billion run-rate revenue milestone back in May 2026.

But here’s the catch: if global tech companies and foreign governments who would have been paying millions for a premium Mythos license are now forced to build or download free local alternatives instead, that $47 billion empire gets incredibly complicated fast.

The White House export ban was explicitly designed to protect America's technological edge. In reality, it may have just turbocharged the global competition to achieve total hardware and software independence.

So what do you think? Do you think Washington's ban completely blew up in its face, or is Sakana's blowfish model just a temporary workaround? 

You should definitely go check out the full reports on this.

Meet America’s Newest $1B Unicorn

A US startup just hit a $1 billion private valuation, joining billion-dollar private companies like SpaceX, OpenAI, and ByteDance. Unlike those other unicorns, you can invest in EnergyX.

Over 50,000 people already have. So have industry giants like General Motors and POSCO.

Why all the interest? EnergyX’s patented tech can recover up to 3X more lithium than traditional methods. That's a big deal, as demand for lithium is expected to 5X current production levels by 2040. Today, they’re moving toward commercial production, tapping into 100,000+ acres of lithium deposits in Chile, a potential $1.1B annual revenue opportunity at projected market prices.

Right now, you can invest at this pivotal growth stage for $13/share. But only through July 16. Become an early-stage EnergyX shareholder before the deadline.

Energy Exploration Technologies, Inc. (“EnergyX”) has engaged Beehiiv to publish this communication in connection with EnergyX’s ongoing Regulation A offering. Beehiiv has been paid in cash and may receive additional compensation. Beehiiv and/or its affiliates do not currently hold securities of EnergyX.

This compensation and any current or future ownership interest could create a conflict of interest. Please consider this disclosure alongside EnergyX’s offering materials. EnergyX’s Regulation A offering has been qualified by the SEC. Offers and sales may be made only by means of the qualified offering circular. Before investing, carefully review the offering circular, including the risk factors. The offering circular is available at invest.energyx.com/.

Comparisons to other companies are for informational purposes only and should not imply similar results. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Market shortfall are forward‑looking estimates and are subject to substantial uncertainty.

🧱 Around The AI Block

🤖 AI Workout Of The Day: How to Turn A/B Data into Actions

Running an A/B test is only half the battle, what you do with the results is what really drives growth. 

The real value comes from turning raw numbers into actionable insights that shape smarter experiments. That’s where this prompt steps in. It helps you cut through the noise, understand whether the results truly matter (statistical significance), and extract lessons you can apply immediately to future tests.

Here’s How to Use This Prompt Effectively

  1. Provide complete test data: include impressions, clicks, conversions, revenue (if applicable), and the exact time window for variants A and B.

  2. Supply context: describe the experiment (what copy/creative/CTA changed), the traffic source, sample size expectations, and the primary metric (CTR, CR, revenue per visitor, etc.).

  3. Specify output format: Do you want a formal report, a bulleted list of insights, or a plain-language breakdown for non-technical teammates? Tell the AI upfront.

  4. Look beyond “who won”: Ask for deeper patterns—why one version worked better, whether sample size was big enough, and what this means for customer behavior.

  5. Iterate: after the analysis, feed back any additional data or constraints and request refined recommendations.

💡 Prompts to try:

I’m [mention the problem you’re facing in detail with background context]. Act as a data analyst specializing in A/B testing. I will give you test results in this format: [insert sample data, e.g., impressions, clicks, conversions for A vs. B].

Your tasks are:

 . Analyze the results and determine whether the difference is statistically significant.
 . Explain which variation is better and why.
 . Highlight behavioral insights revealed by the data.
 . Provide 3 actionable recommendations for the next round of testing based on these insights.

Format the output as:

 . Quick Summary (plain-language takeaway)
 . Detailed Analysis (math/statistics + behavioral reasoning)
 . Actionable Recommendations (concrete next steps)

Keep the explanation clear, visual if possible (tables, percentages), and aligned with the goal of making smarter test decisions.

Is this your AI Workout of the Week (WoW)? Cast your vote!

Login or Subscribe to participate

That's all we've got for you today.

Did you like today's content? We'd love to hear from you! Please share your thoughts on our content below👇

What'd you think of today's email?

Login or Subscribe to participate

Your feedback means a lot to us and helps improve the quality of our newsletter.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

More From The Automated