This website uses cookies

Read our Privacy policy and Terms of use for more information.

In partnership with

Welcome Automaters, 👋

So we're taking The Automated offline! 

Next Saturday, September 12th, we’re hosting our first-ever IRL (in real life) event in Shenzhen, China! 

We’re bringing together a tight-knit mix of builders, founders, investors, and forward-thinkers shaping the future of AI, tech, and Asia. 

Forget the usual conference playbook. There will be no staged panel discussions, no rehearsed keynotes, and zero awkward icebreakers. We’re swapping the stage for a shared table, cold drinks, and genuine dialogue with people doing meaningful work. 

And since this marks our very first live meetup, we're intentionally limiting the headcount to keep the room focused and dynamic. 

So if you've been reading The Automated, building something in Shenzhen, investing in tech, or startups, or you're simply curious about where the industry is heading next, we’d love for you to come say hello.

Here’s the last breakdown On Our YouTube Channel:

We will also be doing a livestream today at 3 PM PST/6 PM EST - so wake up with Tak in the YouTube comments section!

Here's what we have for you today

🤯 OpenAI's New "Reasoning Technique" Has Safety Experts Freaking Out (Plus: Google's Latest Gemini Release Got Pricier)

Imagine your absolute smartest friend suddenly stopped explaining their homework step-by-step and just handed you final answers with a sly smirk. That’s literally what is happening at OpenAI right now, and the AI safety world is running on pure, unadulterated panic.

So What Actually Happened? 

OpenAI is building a new model called Astra, and it uses a wild trick known as recurrent depth (or opaque recurrence, for anyone trying to sound fancy at dinner parties).

Instead of thinking step-by-step out loud, which is how most reasoning AIs operate, Astra loops the exact same problem through its brain over and over behind closed doors. So no paper trail, no receipts. Just vibes and a final answer.

Why Is Everyone Freaking Out?

Normally, an AI's chain of thought (basically its written-out thinking process) acts as a crucial safety net. It gives researchers a front-row seat to catch a model being sneaky, biased, or totally unhinged before it causes real-world chaos.

When OpenAI faced rogue agent misbehavior recently from a model that is ironically from the same Astra family, those exact chain-of-thought records were the key tool used to figure out why the bots went off the rails in the first place.

Sure, every AI does some hidden thinking, and no scientist thinks logs show 100% of a bot's mind. But stripping away visible reasoning entirely? That’s a whole different ballgame, and the safety experts are not taking it well. Here’s what some are saying:

  • The Industry Warning: Redwood Research CEO Buck Shlegeris didn't pull punches, warning on X that scaling this up could completely destroy our ability to monitor AI thoughts.

  • The Legal Push: AI safety writer Zvi Mowshowitz chimed in over on his Substack, hinting that we might need actual laws before tech labs race each other off a cliff.

  • The Tea Gets Hotter: According to The Information, Anthropic and Google DeepMind are already huddled up discussing this exact same technique.

OpenAI Chief Scientist Jakub Pachocki tried to cool down the drama, promising on X that Astra’s use of the trick is super limited and that they remain deeply committed to keeping AI thinking transparent.

Meanwhile, Over at Google... Those guys are officially refusing to chill in the flash-model arms race. They just dropped Gemini 3.8 Flash, landing a mere few weeks after 3.7 Flash (which just took over the Gemini Spark engine). 

Google is pitching this update hard, claiming Gemini 3.8 Flash is their "most intelligent workhorse model, delivering significant improvements from 3.7 Flash across software engineering, agentic tasks, and critical, multi-step reasoning in specialized domains."

Oh, and they didn't stop there. They also quietly rolled out Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber, which they're hyping as their "most capable cybersecurity model with frontier-level performance in vulnerability detection and automated patching”, available only to trusted defenders through their new Fairwind Program.

If you ask me, that isn't just a fast release schedule; that’s a frantic, breakneck speed that proves the cheap-AI market is pure mud-wrestling right now.

And guess what? The headline feature isn't raw benchmark flexes. It's effort.

  • How it works: Google says 3.8 Flash works harder. Ask it something complex, and instead of taking one quick guess, it loops back, double-checks its work, and calls external tools repeatedly before answering. 

  • The cost: The sticker price per token hasn't moved ($0.75 per million input tokens, $3.75 per million output). However, because it thinks way harder, it burns through way more output tokens per query. And in the API world, tokens are literally what you pay for.  For more context: Google straight-up admits that the model "might use more tokens to maximize performance," meaning that static unit price is a total illusion. You could end up paying way more per request, and the real kicker? Developers have zero direct control over how many internal thinking loops it runs before spitting out an answer. 

  • The Developer Backlash Developers aren't blindly jumping on board. Reporting from The Verge notes that builders are already hesitating, waiting for real-world usage benchmarks before making the switch.

Luckily, Google threw budget-conscious devs a bone: Gemini 3.7 Flash isn't going anywhere. If you want predictable, cheap token bills instead of maximum deep-thinking depth, you can stick with the older model. It's a rare concession from a tech giant, proving even Google knows that better doesn't always mean cheaper to run.

The Big Takeaway: AI is getting smarter and moving at absurd speeds, but two massive trends are clear:

  • It’s getting way harder to see how these models calculate answers.

  • It’s getting way harder to predict what your monthly API bill is actually going to look like.

Whether 3.8 Flash becomes the new standard or developers stick to 3.7 Flash to protect their wallets comes down to transparency. For an industry trying to price intelligence itself, these hidden token costs might matter way more than the launch headlines.

Stay plugged in, we're keeping our eyes on both of these sagas! And if you want to know if 3.8 Flash might be worth the cost, then go look up what it’s capable of here

PS: Don’t forget to catch us on YouTube for a visual breakdown later today!

AI made PMs faster. Multiplayer mode is still broken.

A PM can summarize research, draft a PRD, and mock up a prototype before lunch. The hard part starts when the team has to decide what actually gets built.

Jira Product Discovery gives product teams one place to capture insights, prioritize ideas with consistent frameworks, and build living roadmaps stakeholders can rally around.

And because it’s connected to Jira, the context behind every decision stays with the work—so developers and their agents know not just what to build, but why.

AI helps PMs move faster. Jira Product Discovery helps the whole team build with confidence.

🧱 Around The AI Block

🤖 AI Workout Of The Day: Engineering Presentation Graphics & Data Infographics  

Slide decks don't win over audiences through walls of text, they win through clear, compelling visual hierarchy.

When presentations rely on plain bullet points or generic stock photos, cognitive fatigue sets in and critical insights get lost. Translating complex data into custom visual assets, infographics, and clean chart layouts transforms dense information into scannable story arcs. By directing AI with precise visual parameters, color systems, and structural framing, you create presentation assets that command attention, clarify complex data, and drive executive buy-in.

💡 Prompt To Try:

Act as a Principal Visual Designer, Data Visualization Specialist, and Presentation Strategist. Your task is to generate precise visual prompts and design concepts for custom slide graphics, charts, and infographics based on my presentation details below:

* Topic & Context: [INSERT PRESENTATION TOPIC OR BUSINESS CONTEXT]
* Key Data / Raw Insights: [INSERT DATA POINTS, METRICS, SURVEY RESULTS, OR MARKET TRENDS]
* Target Audience & Format: [e.g., Executive Board Meeting, Investor Pitch Deck, Conference Keynote]
* Desired Design Aesthetic: [e.g., Modern Tech Minimalist, Corporate Professional, Bold & Creative]
* Primary Brand Colors: [INSERT BRAND COLORS OR PREFERRED PALETTE, e.g., Navy, Teal, and White]

Please deliver a complete Visual Asset Blueprint structured into the following 4 sections:

1. SLIDE-BY-SLIDE VISUAL CONCEPTS & LAYOUTS: Map out visual assets for 3 core slides:
* Slide Title & Strategic Objective: What key takeaway must this graphic convey instantly?
* Visual Component Breakdown: Specify graphic types (e.g., split-screen infographic, donut chart with callout nodes, 3-step process chevron).
* Graphic Generation Prompts: Provide detailed image-generator prompts (e.g., for Midjourney, DALL-E 3) describing composition, camera angle, lighting, objects, style, and color palette.

2. DATA VISUALIZATION ARCHITECTURE: For raw metrics or data points provided, detail:
* Best Chart Type: Choose between bar charts, trend lines, waterfall diagrams, or custom infographics, explaining *why* it fits the data structure best.
* Visual Emphasis Points: Specify which elements should use accent colors, bold callouts, or key milestone badges to guide viewer attention.

3. ICONOGRAPHY & ILLUSTRATION SYSTEM: Define 4-5 thematic vector icons or visual metaphors to represent abstract ideas on slides (e.g., "Growth" represented by an ascending rocket vector, "Security" by a modern shield mesh).

4. SLIDE COMPOSITION & TYPOGRAPHY GUIDELINES
* Layout Rules: Grid arrangements, whitespace allocations, and visual hierarchy tips to keep slides clean and scannable.
* Presenter Guidance: A 1-sentence tip on how to present each graphic on stage so it supports the speaker without distracting the audience.

TONE & EXECUTION GUIDELINES:
* Approach this with a sharp, design-forward, and highly professional tone.
* Use Markdown tables, headers, and bulleted lists to make the blueprint easy to hand off to a visual designer or input into AI image generators.

Is this your AI Workout of the Week (WoW)? Cast your vote!

Login or Subscribe to participate

That's all we've got for you today.

Did you like today's content? We'd love to hear from you! Please share your thoughts on our content below👇

What'd you think of today's email?

Login or Subscribe to participate

Your feedback means a lot to us and helps improve the quality of our newsletter.

More From The Automated

View more
caret-right